Market Opportunity

Loop-ah targets a large, waste-heavy category with a circular hygiene system that cuts laundry load, labor, water, energy (kWh), chemicals, and towel-replacement costs—while elevating guest experience. Capture is contract-driven, converting rooms into predictable refill revenue.

TAM: — SAM: — SOM: — Unit Cost Trend: —
View Investors See the Cartridge Contact
Market sizing funnel illustrating TAM, SAM, and SOM for Loop-ah™
  • Phase 1 — Hospitality Core + Portal v1: order & reporting portal; scale pilots and early contracts.
  • Phase 2 — Residential: DTC & retail channel for recurring cartridges; subscription-ready.
  • Phase 3 — Education & Healthcare: institutional footprint with compliance-friendly workflows.
  • Phase 4 — Product Extensions: infused scents and embedded body-wash variants.
  • Phase 5 — Analytics & ESG Dashboards: advanced impact reporting for enterprise buyers.
  • Phase 6 — ERP Integrations: SAP/NetSuite hooks to automate POs, invoicing, and rollout.
Phasing de-risks scale: early wins in hospitality validate margin and operations, then learnings roll into broader verticals. The result is a repeatable playbook that compounds GM, builds ARR, and shortens payback.

Next: stress the numbers and model scenarios → Investors

The market potential is enormous — but so are the inefficiencies it hides. Hotels spend millions managing the very waste Loop-ah™ eliminates. Our opportunity isn’t just growth — it’s correction. By addressing what drains profit and ESG credibility today, we build a cleaner, more efficient tomorrow. → See how Loop-ah™ mitigates cost and waste

Next: why Loop-ah specifically wins under these forces → Why Loop-ah, specifically

Why Loop-ah Works as an Investment

Contract-first revenue with high-GM refills turns rooms into predictable ARR. Capex-light installs and fast payback compound across a portfolio.

From Rooms to Contracted ARR — Loop-ah portal and hardware on a desk
Request Investor Meeting View Investor Deck

Marriott $1.2M Benchmark vs. Loop‑ah™

Industry reference vs. modeled value per room (opex + towel replacement avoided + Cartridge GP). Cards below show how many rooms are required to reach $1.2M annually under each approach.

Marriott $1.2M benchmark — comparison of rooms required vs Loop-ah
Visual snapshot: industry reference vs. Loop-ah portfolio footprint to reach $1.2M/year.
Why this matters
    Figures annual; normalized per-room value basis; Cartridge GP included for investor view.

    Next: see the 100-room operational breakdown ↓

    Ops Savings Breakdown — Loop-ah™ (Annual, 100 Rooms)

    Investor view: total includes Cartridge GP. Figures annual; water includes sewer.

    Loop-ah™ operational savings breakdown illustration (annual, 100 rooms)

    Annual Value (100 rooms)

    Component Annual (100 rooms) % of total
    Data not initialized. Please reload once inputs are available.

    Figures annual; water includes sewer; timeframes normalized as shown.

    Next: See how Loop-ah™ compares to Industry Standards →

    Industry vs Loop‑ah™ — Savings / Value (USD) — 500 Rooms

    The setup: published programs show modest savings per room. Loop-ah layers operating savings, towel life, and Cartridge GP (investor lens)—so value compounds at portfolio scale.
    What you’ll see: each benchmark is normalized to 500 rooms and to the study’s timeframe; the Loop-ah column models the same timeframe.
    Loop‑ah™ outperforms documented programs—consistently and at scale.
    Industry KPI Documented Result (normalized to 500) Loop‑ah™ (500, same timeframe) % Lift vs Industry Why Loop-ah Wins Here
    Figures annual; water includes sewer; timeframes normalized as shown.

    Next: dig into Investor Metrics for contract cadence and ARR.